Re: Future of DBWS

R.A. Young ( r.young@physics.gatech.edu )
Mon, 30 Jun 1997 08:54:18

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: Linda D. Mansker: "Re: (Rietveld Calc Data) vs (ICDD Ref Data lacking trace peaks)"
Next message: Carsten Schinzer: "Re: (Rietveld Calc Data) vs (ICDD Ref Data lacking trace peaks)"
Maybe in reply to: Diffract@aol.com: "Future of DBWS"

At 07:11 PM 6/26/97 -0400, Dr. Keller wrote:
>
>Could somebody comment on the future of DBWS, a fine and robust Rietveld
>code. However, it strongly appears that the future lies in programs like GSAS
>which snaps up all the support for the latest graphics routines as well as
>other advanced implementations. The latest version of DBWS (I know of) dates
>from 1994. Are there any upgrades or implementation of additional features
>into DBWS planned?

Yes, some small ones almost immediately and some more, but still not
dramatic ones later.

R. A. Young, Professor Emeritus
School of Physics
Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
Tel: 404-894-5208
e-mail: r.young@physics.gatech.edu

Previous message: Linda D. Mansker: "Re: (Rietveld Calc Data) vs (ICDD Ref Data lacking trace peaks)"
Next message: Carsten Schinzer: "Re: (Rietveld Calc Data) vs (ICDD Ref Data lacking trace peaks)"
Maybe in reply to: Diffract@aol.com: "Future of DBWS"