Re: LaB6 and Si Standards

L. Cranswick ( L.M.D.Cranswick@dl.ac.uk )
Sat, 20 Jun 1998 20:44:36 +0100 (BST)

What is the reason for the internal standard - peak positions or
determining amorphous material?

----

Silicon is considered the phase to use as a peak position standard.

As NIST has run out of NBS 640x for the forseeable future(?),
one option to obtain a good sample of Si for powder X-ray
diffraction purposes is Deane K. Smith's Gem Dugout.
"Deane K. Smith MRL/PSU" <SMITH@PSUMRL1.PSU.EDU>

Not sure of other good sources of Silion powder diffraction
stnadards?

Lachlan.

>
> I have to collect data on a sample with an internal standard and was
> wondering whether LaB6 or Si is preferable. The NIST standard for LaB6
> is rather expensive and was considering buying the 99.9% pure LaB6 from
> a supplier like CERAC. Is this sufficient for using as an internal
> standard? The same for Si?
>
> Thanks,
> Laurance Beauvais
> Long Group
> Dept. of Chemistry
> UC Berkeley
> http://alchemy.cchem.berkeley.edu
> lgb@alchemy.cchem.berkeley.edu
>

-- Lachlan M. D. CranswickCollaborative Computational Project No 14 (CCP14)    for Single Crystal and Powder DiffractionDaresbury Laboratory, Warrington, WA4 4AD U.KTel: +44-1925-603703  Fax: +44-1925-603124  E-mail: l.cranswick@dl.ac.uk   Ext: 3703  Room C14CCP14 Webpage (Under heavy reconstruction):   http://www.dl.ac.uk/CCP/CCP14/