[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sdpd] error measurements

To: sdpd...@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [sdpd] error measurements
From: Jaap Vente <jaap...@jade.mda.cinvestav.mx>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:15:22 -0600 (CST)
Delivered-to: mailing list sdpd...@egroups.com
In-reply-to: <01012316222672...@img.cryst.bbk.ac.uk>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:sdpd-unsubscribe...@egroups.com>
Mailing-list: list sdpd...@egroups.com; contact sdpd-owner...@egroups.com
Reply-to: sdpd...@egroups.com

I agree with Jeremy Cockcroft that in THEORY you can substract the
background both before and after refinement. The first option is
actually rather difficult when you have peaks close to each other or with
overlapping peaks. Or you must assume a constant background or so. The
second option cause problems due to correlations between thermal and/or
displacement parameters and the background. 

I think we all would agree very quickly on how to treat SrO and get
reliable values, but life is not so easy with the more complicated
structures.


Jaap Vente
Cinvestav-IPN Unidad Merida
Departamento de Fisica Aplicada
Carretera Ant. a Progreso km 6
Apartado Postal #73 Cordemex
Merida, Yucatan, 97310
Mexico
Fax: +52 (9) 981 29 17
Tel: +52 (9) 981 29 60 ext 243/230
e-mail: jaap...@mda.cinvestav.mx
web: http://www.mda.cinvestav.mx/

References:
- Re: [sdpd] error measurements
  - From: cockcroft...@gordon.cryst.bbk.ac.uk

Prev by Date: Re: [sdpd] error measurements
Next by Date: Re: [sdpd] error measurements
Previous by thread: Re: [sdpd] error measurements
Next by thread: Re: [sdpd] error measurements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread