[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [sdpd] XRDU:RIET: Review references for refining structures in too high a symmetry?



 >Other papers similar to the situation in the ACA 2004 abstract of
 >Clearfield, Bestaoui, Ouyang, Fredoueil, Bujoli appreciated.
 >
 >"Crystal Structure of Cd3(O3PC2H4CO2)2.2H2O : Influence of the Solid
 >State NMR in the Structure Determination"
 > http://www.hwi.buffalo.edu/ACA/ACA04/abstracts/text/W0313.pdf
 >
 >Lachlan

In the abstract, one can find :
"The systematic absences were consistent with P21 /c and P21"

Is there not a typo ? This would be understandable if the statement
was instead :
"The systematic absences were consistent with P21 /m and P21"

Because there is not any consistency between the systematic absences
of the P21 /c and P21 spacegroups...

So, if there was a typo, this is just the presence or not of an
inversion center which is in question.

If there is not a typo, then this would mean that the h0l with l=2n+1
which are unambiguous (with no overlapping) on the powder
pattern have zero intensity, explaining that first choice of the P21/c
space group. But, when selecting P21, it would be surprising if
all h0l with l=2n+1 wero fortuitously null.

In that later explanation telling that :
"The systematic absences were consistent with P21 /c and P21"
is too short (would need more explanation) and remains a nonsense.

Armel




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/UIYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    sdpd-unsubscribe...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/