>Just as an information to those interested, I'll be comparing the
>"fundamental-parameter" with "standard" approach in my talk at the EPDIC-6
>(morning of Aug 25). Of course, it won't be as detailed as we expect from
>the workshop, but maybe from a little different perspective. This comparison
>is likely to complement (and contradict ?) Armel Le Bail's remarks at the
>last week's Denver X-Ray Conference (for those not able to attend, I suppose
>that Armel made his position on this question known to this mailing list's
>audience last month).
Thanks Davor. I don't know if my remarks are of interest. Anyway, the full
text and slides of my conference at Denver are already available at :
http://fluo.univ-lemans.fr:8001/microstruct/denver/
About the approach of g in the h=f*g convolution, the main remark was :
use the method fitting g at best, whatever this method is. This advice
seems reasonable, I hope ?
Armel