[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[sdpd] Re: SDPD stagnation

To: sdpd...@egroups.com
Subject: [sdpd] Re: SDPD stagnation
From: Lubomir Smrcok <uachsmrk...@savba.sk>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:16:12 +0100 (MET)
Delivered-to: listsaver-egroups-sdpd...@egroups.com
In-reply-to: <000a01bf7de6$4125a740$ad0e1a81...@holger1.gmd.de>
List-archive: <http://www.egroups.com/group/sdpd/>
List-help: <http://www.egroups.com/group/sdpd/info.html>, <mailto:sdpd-help...@egroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:sdpd-unsubscribe...@egroups.com>
Mailing-list: contact sdpd-owner...@egroups.com
Reply-to: sdpd...@egroups.com

On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Dr. Holger Putz wrote:

> This is exactly the point where I see the advantage of commercial
> programs...they allow a lot more people

Last words are a practical joke if you consider prices ...
Lubo

References:
- [sdpd] Re: SDPD stagnation
  - From: "Dr. Holger Putz" <holger.putz...@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: [sdpd] Re: SDPD stagnation
Next by Date: [sdpd] Re: SDPD stagnation
Previous by thread: [sdpd] Re: SDPD stagnation
Next by thread: [sdpd] Re: SDPD stagnation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread